Who we are       What we do     Virtual Tour     Latest News     No Freeway Petition      
Public Transport - Have Your Say     Useful Links       In the Press       Contact Us
Home / Friends of Banyule Newsletter : June/July 2010
Friends of Banyule Newsletter : June/July 2010


In this issue # 6

Where Goes the North-East Link

Update from Banyule Council

Public Meeting in October

Save Our Bush Alliance Rally

Local Photographer

Bad News for Heritage Listing

Inappropriate Development along the Yarra

Peninsula Link Freeway Update

Urban Growth Boundary

 

Past Editions of our Newsletter

Wetlands_VT_1


 

Where goes the North-East Link - A 6 Billion Dollar Project without a plan? - Our meeting with VicRoads

Representatives of Friends of Banyule and Protectors of Public Lands met on 20 April with representatives of VicRoads North East Link project team. The meeting was arranged at our request with the hope of finding out more about government intentions for the project.

This meeting was a sequel to an earlier meeting, on 1 May 2009, with the Southern and Eastern Integrated Transport (SEITA) which then had bureaucratic responsibility for the proposed North-East Link, now ceded to VicRoads.

People in Banyule, as well as much wider afield, have become increasingly anxious about the proposed project since its sudden resurrection by the Brumby government in the December 2008 Victorian Transport Plan. If it were to go ahead the project would cut the communities of Viewbank, Rosanna, Heidelberg and Bulleen in half and destroy one of the most important historical and environmental assets in the City of Banyule - the Banyule Flats Wetlands and Warringal Park Swamplands.

It would be fair to report that the greater interest from the meeting on 20 April lies in what was left unsaid rather than what was disclosed by official government representatives.

Representatives were unable to say when they expected construction might commence, much less were they able to indicate when the government intended the first vehicles to roll along the North-East Link. There has been reference to 2017 as a starting date, but this remained unclear, and if 2017 is a starting date whether it is for the commencement of construction or the completion of the project.

We referred to a September 2008 report undertaken by the consultants, GHD, for the Department of Premier and Cabinet which included traffic projections for the proposed freeway which anticipated very high motorcar usage and relatively low usage by commercial vehicles. VicRoads was unable to provide any advance on these figures. The government's proposal to extend the Urban Growth Boundary, with concomitant increases in population, is thought likely to change this equation.

VicRoads was asked what parameters they were working with for travel by public transport as opposed to private motor vehicle in determining the need for and carrying capacity of North East Link. VicRoads indicated that the government had an objective that 20% of all journeys made in Melbourne be by public transport. This objective, set for achievement in 2020, had already been met.

No advice was able to be given by VicRoads on addressing current issues related to traffic congestion, including on Rosanna Road. VicRoads advised that this was the responsibility of the organisation's South East and North West Metropolitan regional operations.

Traffic congestion

There has been understandable speculation in the community about the intended route for the proposed freeway. We drew attention to the most recent edition of the Melbourne Melway and the fact that it included a dotted line route for North-East Link. VicRoads representatives indicated that the initiative for its inclusion in the Melway did not come from their project team but is likely to have come from elsewhere within VicRoads. They were unable to advise whether it was an officially decided route for the freeway.

VicRoads officials were able to confirm that a cost-benefit analysis of the project would be undertaken and that this would be released publicly in a timely manner.

The issue of project funding was raised with officials. It was noted that a project cost of $6 billion was included in the Victorian Transport Plan (dated 2008). It was unable to be confirmed whether this would be the final figure. We asked what capital contribution the Brumby government would be seeking from the Commonwealth government and whether the request was likely to be acceded to. VicRoads was unable to advise on this but did say several other transport projects which had received Commonwealth contributions ranging between 50% and 100% of project costs.

VicRoads was asked whether the Victorian government was looking towards a restructuring of the toll road industry as a precursor to attracting private sector operators for the project. They advised they had no information on that.

We noted rising apprehension about noise level emissions from freeways in Melbourne and especially resident concerns related to the Monash Freeway and also the Eastern Freeway in Balwyn North. VicRoads replied that they do have noise standards that they apply. In broad terms the current maximum is said to be 63dBA. Standards appear to apply for traffic movements between 6 am and 12 am only. No such protection apparently applies between 12 am and 6 am.

VicRoads was asked about the lighting levels they apply for illumination of the road network. We introduced material which pointed to adverse health effects of excessive lighting in cities, including increased human and animal sickness. VicRoads said that they have progressively increased the efficiency of their lighting systems in the road network.

VicRoads was asked to confirm the government statement in The Victorian Transport Plan that it was expected to construct the freeway by tunnel. VicRoads advised that this is not certain and will be subject to additional inquiry.

It is not known whether the project will be "fast-tracked" under new legislated provisions for transport projects which were enacted in 2009.

 

Back to top

 

Council Update on the North-East Link

The following is an excerpt from Banyule Council Meeting Agenda for the meeeting held on 5th July 2010.  A copy of Council's Agenda is available on their website at http://www.banyule.vic.gov.au/Assets/Files/OM%205%20July%202010%20Agenda.pdf

FORWARD PLANNING       ORDINARY MEETING ON 5 JULY 2010       Page 38

FPOC.112 NORTH-EAST ROAD LINK QUARTERLY UPDATE           <Michelle Herbert - City Development>        BS20/045/005

PROPOSAL

To provide Councillors with an update on the status of the proposed north-east road link.

BACKGROUND

Council considered a report on the status of the proposed north-east road link and an overview of relevant Council resolutions and positions on the link, regional transport, and associated heritage and environmental issues at its meeting on 14 December 2009. Council resolved as follows:

1. That the report be received.

2. That an Expression of Interest (EOI) be prepared for consideration in the 2010/2011    budget for Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the Environment and Heritage Overlay for the  Banyule Flats and Warringal Parklands.

3. That Council write to the Minister for Roads and Ports requesting:

 A written three-monthly update on progress and activities undertaken to progress    the planning for the proposed North-East link.

 Current timeline for the completion of this planning phase of the North-East link.

 That short term and medium term steps be undertaken by the Victorian    Government to reduce the current congestion and safety issues in Rosanna    Road and Greensborough Road until any longer term solution is implemented.

 The breakdown between commercial traffic and private car usage that comprises    the estimated 145,000 vehicles that Option 3 (listed on page 80 of the Agenda) is  expected to attract.

 That in Council's view further investigation is required into an alternative to a    freeway through Banyule.

4. That Council officers report to the Council every three-months on the response from    the Minister, VicRoads or other Government departments or agencies on progress in    the planning of the North-East link.

5. That local State MPs be forwarded copies of all correspondence received and sent as    a result of this resolution.

Items 2, 3 and 5 of the above resolution were actioned in February 2010. On 1 March 2010, in accordance with item 4 of the above resolution, Council considered a report for the three month period January to March 2010. Council resolved to receive the report.

PROGRESS

The only correspondence received in the current three-month period April to June 2010, which relates to the north-east link is a letter dated 14 April 2010 from the Minister for Roads and Ports responding to Council's resolution of 14 December 2009. Please refer to a copy of this correspondence attached.

Page 39

The letter provides a brief update on the merits of the north-east link, and the intent of the State Government to work with Council and residents in its development. The letter indicates that the medium-term project is estimated to cost $6 billion and when built it would be one of the largest road projects in Victoria. Its route will be located between Greensborough and Bulleen, but no other information on the road alignment or its connection to other arterial roads is given.

The Minister indicates that while planning for the road is at a preliminary stage, VicRoads proposes to carry out extensive environmental and engineering investigations to determine the exact route of the north east link. This will take time. VicRoads will work with Councils and residents and consider their views in the detailed planning stage, which is expected to take several years.

The Minister also states that arterial roads are regularly monitored for congestion and road safety and improvements funded on a statewide priority needs basis. This will be the case for Rosanna and Greensborough Roads.  VicRoads officers advise that no further progress has been made in relation to the planning of the north-east link at this time.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the report be received.

 

Back to top



 

Friends of Banyule - Public Meeting in October

We are planning a Public Meeting on the evening of 6th October to be held at The Centre in Ivanhoe. The Meeting's objective is to raise public awareness about the planned Freeway, discuss alternatives and highlight how the Freeway, if it proceeds, will impact our community.

A number of high profile keynote speakers (including Rod Quantock and Paul Mees) are invited, so stay tuned for more news about the October Public Meeting.

 

Back to top

 

Save Our Bush Alliance Rally - 2 June 2010

A Rally convened by the Save our Bush Alliance (SOBA) was held on Wednesday 2 June 2010 outside the Transport Forum at the Crown Conference Centre. The Transport Forum convened to discuss and promote the Government's Transport Plan, and included various members of the transport and infrastructure lobby and guest speakers from both Government agencies and the private sector, as well as Roads Minister, Tim Pallas as the keynote speaker.

The Rally was attended by a dedicated and enthusiastic group, with lots of banners and placards and a vocal chant calling for "no more freeways".  Those across the road at the Transport Forum were in no doubt of our views and our intent. A police and security contingent directly outside the centre almost out-numbered those protesting.

The Rally was organised by the Save Our Bush Alliance (SOBA) group. MC was Gillian Collins of Pines Protectors and other attendees/speakers included Dee Anne Kelly - Greens, Frankston, Sue Pennicuick - Greens MP (Southern Metropolitan), Damon Anderson - Save Coomoora Reserve, Rosemary West - Green Wedges Coalition and Dennis O'Connell on behalf of Friends of Banyule.

There were some excellent and quite passionate speeches made.  A media presence across the road recorded some footage of the rally.

To our surprise, Roads Minister Tim Pallas, accepted an invitation to come across the road and address the Rally directly. A motion from the Rally in opposition to the Peninsular Link freeway but suggesting options, including upgraded public transport for the area, was put to Mr. Pallas. Some of the attendees, especially from Save the Pines and Willow Bank Road/Pobblebank Nature Reserve strongly put their case to the Minister - that bulldozers had already gone into these reserves destroying animals and wild life which were not able to be removed to a safe shelter or other reserve prior to the bulldozers going in. This was despite an Environmental Management Plan supposedly being in place.

The Minister while stating that construction of the Freeway would proceed, indicated that he was concerned about what had conveyed to him by those attending the rally and believed the damage to wildlife should not have occurred. He advised that he would undertake to find out why this had happened and why the contractors had not put measures in place to prevent it occurring. We will have to wait and see whether the Minister is as good as his word.              


       

soba Rally 2_2

Minister, Tim Pallas addressing the Rally 

 

For links to the other groups represented at this rally - S.O.B.A., go to our Links page Save Coomoora Reserve, Protectors of Public Lands, 

Back to top

 

Meet local Photographer Ross Spirou

Ross Spirou_wetlands     Friends of Banyule would like to introduce local photographer Ross Spirou.

Ross has a keen interest in wildlife and fauna and loves particularly Banyule Flats Wetlands for its rich heritage and animal life. Please take a look at his images on theFlickr website - it is truly stunning and beautiful photography of our area.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/raskimon/sets/72157624158495258/

 

Back to top

 

Bad News for Heritage Listing for Banyule Flats

Banyule Council has not allocated the $100,000 necessary to commence the process of Heritage Listing for the Banyule Flats Wetlands area. The basis for their decision apparently was that the State Government would not be likely approve Heritage Listing if the Government wanted to build a freeway through the area and therefore the money would be wasted.

The Major Transport Facilitations Act passed in October 2009 further disregards any Heritage Acts currently in place. It is incredibly disappointing that Council has not followed through on their promises to their constituents given in May 2009 and again in July that same year and commence the Heritage Listing process.   Friends of Banyule will continue to strongly lobby for Heritage Listing for Banyule Flats Wetlands Warringal Parklands and Bolin Bolin Billabong.

Parklands_1

Back to top

No Freeway Signs

Logo

No Freeway through Banyule signs made from a light-weight & weatherproof material corflute will be available soon.

The size of the sign is 400mm x 600mm, with black printing on a white background and the message
'NO FREEWAY THROUGH BANYULE" in large print on it.  We will also include a small picture of our Logo (at left) at the bottom on the sign.

The signs will be able to be mounted on fence lines as well as erected in front and back yards 

These signs aim to raise public awareness of the planned freeway, as well as letting our local, State and Federal Members of Parliament know that their constituents are not happy about the proposed freeway/tunnel/viaduct.

Please contact us if

  • you would like a sign

  • want to help with door-knocking and sign distribution

 

Contact: Mobile 0413 41 88 32 (leave voice message)

Email: info@friendsofbanyule.org


 

 

 

Inappropriate Development : Honeywell site fast-tracked at VCAT

Downstream from Banyule along the Yarra River, inappropriate development of the Honeywell site in Richmond is setting an unfortunate precedence for future development in our municipality. The appeal of the Yarra River Action Alliance has been fast-tracked at VCAT with the hearing starting 9th August. The Yarra River Action Alliance's case is simply that Yarra Council has exceeded its discretion... Honeywell is too tall, too dense and not set back enough from the river.

As reported in previous Newsletters, the proposed eleven storey 550 apartment development on the Yarra River at Abbotsford, is being opposed by the Yarra River Action Alliance (YRAA). They have raised sufficient funds by public subscription to pay for legal representtaion,but are appealing for further funds  for expert wittnesses to counter those of the developer, who is sufficiently cashed up to run a major case with all the necceesary experts, consultants and senior legal counsel. This high rise development on the Yarra is seen as a test case which will if the appeal is unsuccsessful, allow further unsympathetic overdevelopment along the Yarra negatively impacting the riverine environment (both down and upstream). 

Catherine Santo of YRAA has recently provided the following update:

The Honeywell development went to mediation at VCAT on Thursday 8/7/10. Unsurprisingly, the matter did not settle.  Surprisingly however, after saying they would not compromise on height, the developers offered a settlement of 1 storey off the tallest tower, taking it to 10 storeys (with the other 2 towers remaining unchanged at 9). The objectors rejected that offer and made a counter offer of a height of RL 35, which is halfway between the 5-6 storeys the Planning Scheme says the preferred height should be, and RL 41, the maximum height specified in the Planning Scheme.  They rejected the counter offer and the matter is now booked in for the 5 day hearing starting 9th August.  Mediation was very useful in getting a clear picture of the developers' case and identifying the key issues that the hearing will turn on.  In particular, it was clear that architectural superiority and environmentally sustainable design will be two of the major determinantsin the justification for the additional height that we will need to counter. 

So it is onward and forward now in preparing for the hearing.  We have secured an excellent witness, as has City of Boroondara (who are also objecting) and following mediation we are exploring what other witnesses are needed whilst endeavouring to share expertise amongst the objectors to avoid duplication and keep costs down. 

 

For more information go to www.yarrariveractionalliance.com           Friends of Banyule contact: Dennis O'Connell    email : dennisoc@bigpond.net.au

 

Back to top

 

Peninsula Link Freeway Update
 
Gillian Collins of Save the Pines, who is leading the community picket at the Westerfield property at Frankston North, where the $875 m Peninsula link Freeway is planned to go through, provided the following update on the current situation with the picket and appeal to Heritage Victoria.
 
Advice from Rosemary West of Green Wedges (and member of Save our Bush Alliance), indicates that the contractor Abi Group, has now agreed to halt the bulldozers currently standing by at the site, until the appeal before Heritage Victoria regarding the National Trust and Heritage listed Westerfield property, is heard.
 
I visited the site last weekend and spoke to Gillian Collins of Pines Protectors, Joyce Welsh one of the owners of Westerfield and other picketers. I was impressed by their passion and determination to protect the unique flora and fauna,  much of which is amongst the last original remnant examples on the Peninsula and possibly the State.
 
The 27 kilometer Peninsula Link Freeway, for much of its length, runs parallel to the existing Mooraduc Highway and will effectively be a feeder for East Link, which is struggling to produce the traffic numbers originally promised. The solution from the road lobby appears to be, eventually to link up all freeways from the Peninsula, via East Link, the F18 "missing link" through Banyule, to the Western Ring Road and eventually the F6/E6 Outer Metropolitan Ring Road. Melbourne will be completely encircled and criss-crossed by freeways, interchanges and roads... further locking us into a carbon dependent energy future. This in an age of rapidly diminishing oil reserves and environmental disasters such as the Gulf of Mexico, as oil drilling increasingly occurs in more pristine environments and at deeper levels, with the potential for further devastating impacts on the environment becoming ever more likely.
 
The picket at Westerfield is important as an example of community action at the local level, halting the bulldozers, forcing the contractor to discuss issues regarding the environmental management plan (which is supposed to be in place but up till now largely ignored) and await the outcome of the hearing by Heritage Victoria and the appeal on conditions in the permit.
 
The public are increasingly becoming aware that spending priorities by government are unfairly skewed toward the building of roads and freeways at the expense of public transport and the wider environment. A meeting with the Minister, Abi Group, the Building Council and community groups is currently being sought. Friends of Banyule strongly supports community action by local groups (with whom we are affiliated through Green Wedges and Save our Bush Alliance), facing similar issues, exercising their democratic rights in a peaceful but effective manner.
 
Dennis O'Connell

More information is available at  www.savethepines.net and www.savewesterfields.net  


Urban Growth Boundary

From Julianne Bell, Secretary, Protectors of Public Lands Vic. Inc

As you will be aware, the Growth Areas Infrastructure Contribution Bill 2010 ("contribution" = euphemism for land tax) was passed at the last sitting of Parliament. Despite previously opposing the Bill, the Coalition (Liberals and Nationals) voted for it with the ALP. (Now it's enshrined in legislation as the Growth Areas Infrastructure Contribution Act 2010.) Now we have a Planning Scheme Amendment which includes extension of the Urban Growth Boundary. This will mean rural land can be rezoned as residential around Melbourne and will mean the land tax can be applied. This brings the prospect of increased urban sprawl; increased reliance on cars; increased green house gas emissions; destruction of Green Wedges and the environment.   Read more ...>


Back to top

 

pt2me2  Survey Results

The pt4me2 people's poll received over 10,700 responses.      Last week, they presented your comments and the final report to the Minister for Public Transport, Opposition Transport spokesperson, Greens transport spokesperson and the Premier's office.  To see the result of the survey go to their website.   Read more ...>

 

Newsletter Archive

if you would like to take a look at any of our past Newsletters, they are available at  /latest-news.aspx#FOB%20newsletters) on the Latest News page of the Friends of Banyule website at www.friendsofbanyule.org

 

Back to top

 

Links

Some interesting & sometimes quirky news past our editorial desk .....

The Yike Bike

TruFood Network

Allan Cuthbertson

Save Coomoora Reserve : Smoke & Mirrors article

Warringal Conservation Society Newsletter  [PDF}

The Green Leaflet

 

For lots more news, views, opinion and campaign updates, go to our website at www.friendsofbanyule.org or click on the tabbed links at the top of this Newsletter 

We appreciate your feedback, so please contact us on email  info@friendsofbanyule.org  or our mobile (leave a voice message)  0413 41 88 32

 

 

 

Wildlife in Banyule

 


 

Back to top

 

Copyright © 2008 Friends of Banyule. All rights reserved. Created by countonline